Recommended Dog Food

The act of racing one greyhound hostile to another is not necessarily hazardous for the dogs. View racing at Odense (Denmark) and rarely will you see an incident resulting in serious injury but Odense is one of the few tracks where greyhounds run on a straight course (over a 260 metre distance, writes Clive Ellis of Greyhound Mind.

 

In Britain, but, as in Ireland (and a number of other countries where greyhound racing is held) the dogs run on an oval-like path that in effect comprises two straights leading into tight bends. This configuration can prove lethal for the greyhounds with the risk of injury rising significantly when dogs are pitted hostile to each other.

 

At the time of writing here are 25 tracks regulated below the Greyhound Board of Fantastic Britain (GBGB) and 12 independent venues across England, Scotland and Wales.

 

Whilst all of the above are oval-like in configuration, variations exist from track to track in length of straights, banking and tightness of bends. Here exists also huge disparity in the depth of sand (used for the surface and middle layers) and composition of base layer that in turn can affect the performance of a track.

 

Such variations impression on safety as does the maintenance of the track, operation of the mechanical hare, trap draw, grade, race distance and weather conditions. Research to date, but, would indicate that even where all factors relating to safety are judged ideal the frequency of injuries will never fall dramatically whilst dogs are competing on oval-like circuits.

 

Track ‘improvements’

 

In May 2008 the track at Owlerton (Sheffield) received both a new surface and drainage system costing in the region £125,000. All-purpose Administrator Dave Perry was reported adage: “It is all in this area the welfare of our greyhounds here at Owlerton. The resurfacing of the track will increase our already high standards.”

 

Owlerton was a track that Perry apparently considered “one of the safest in the country” prior to the work carried out and with no change in its configuration was here ever likely to be a notable reduction in dogs injured?

 

On Greyhoundscene – the largest internet forum for UK members of the racing fraternity – the following posting was made in July 2008: “What’s going on at Sheffield – injury tariff (have) nearly trebled since the track re-laid the surface at massive cost. All sorts of injuries life reported by all trainers – shoulders, wrists, gracilis, hocks… here'll be no sound dogs left at this rate!”

 

Similarly, two months following ‘improvements’ at Yarmouth Stadium in June 2010 to include a new surface and drainage and costing £190,000, owners were reporting a notable increase in the frequency of injuries – many serious – in both trials and races.

 

Anomalies in injury tariff are inevitable and looking long term I would not expect such tariff at either Sheffield or Yarmouth to be higher. By the same token I would be very surprised if either were to fall significantly.

 

Yarmouth Racing Administrator Bill Johnson, speaking in August, believed the level of injuries had changed small since the work carried out. Perry said the injury rate at Sheffield had fallen but refused to say by how much as he felt the information could be used by those who appose racing.

 

Of course it’s excellent PR to claim 6 figure sums are life spent in the name of welfare, and I have no doubt that welfare is a factor (injuries to greyhounds are costly for both the owner and the business of racing) but if changes to the track have at best only a marginal impression on safety what other motive could here be for the money invested?

 

A clue can be found on another internet posting, over Over again concerning the work at Sheffield: “Hopefully (it will) make the conditions fairer and remove the bias when the rain comes.”

 

Both the promoters and GBGB are in quest of to protect and strengthen the integrity of racing. A excellent track surface, properly maintained, is a prerequisite for a consistent racing environment. This in turn gives the betting public the assurance that race outcomes are based solely on the dog’s ability.

 

It is further hoped that money life invested in ‘welfare’ will reduce the number of meetings cancelled due to terrible weather that over Over again can be very costly for the business of racing.

 

Injuries, Perry Barr

 

In a thesis published 1992 and titled The Nature and Incidence of Greyhound Racing Injuries, Agnew BP examined a record of injuries across 953 race meetings at Perry Barr (Birmingham). 

 

Perry Barr was converted from a grass/sand track to a modern all sand facility in 1978 and data was examined from both before and after the change in the running surface was made. It is data relating to the modern facility that of course carries particular weight and the statistics make for fascinating reading.

 

1612 injuries were recorded across 748 meetings. This was broken down as follows: shoulder, 205; carpus, 475; metacarpus, 24; forefoot, 127; hindmuscle, 227; hock, 58; metatarsus, 5; hindfoot, 144; cramp, 234; combination, 54; miscellaneous, 59.

 

Career ending injuries are commonly hock related and out of the 58 listed above 2 greyhounds were recorded retired and 21 were recorded ruined. This data, but, is based solely on the immediate post race choice.

 

Particularly notable is the injury rate as a percentage of runners rose from 4.6 for the year prior to conversion to an all sand facility to 6.6 for the year following conversion. The percentage rate for the all sand facility does later fall (3.9 life the lowest figure) but the difference is not as fantastic as force be expected for the change made in the track surface.

 

Notable also is the figures for single limb injuries as a percentage of total injuries recorded that rose from 65.2 for the grass/sand track to 81.2 for the all sand facility.

 

The survey at Perry Barr is one of a number of similar studies both in Britain and abroad across which here exists a lack of uniformity in the recording of information and findings. Where consistency, but, does exist is in the analysis of data and the evident correlation between numerous injuries and track configuration.

 

Agnew concluded that the principal causal factor for injury patterns was the “certain and set task demanded of these athletes; the racing at speed on tight anti-clockwise tracks.”

 

Cornering

 

Sprinting into a bend increases effective body weight and a human will respond to this by extending the duration of contact each foot has with the ground. As a result, forces on the legs are said to remain constant.

 

A study, but, by Usherwood JR and Wilson AM and featured in Nature (Vol. 438), found that in greyhounds observed here was no notable change in foot contact timings when the dogs entered a tight bend. As such, forces on the limbs were calculated to increase by approximately 65%.

 

The use of banking will reduce horizontal loads and this in turn may see a reduction in injury tariff. It has been calculated, but, that the point of banking required to negate such forces would be so high as to generate additional hazards for the greyhounds as well proving nearly impossible to maintain.

 

Indeed modern thinking with regard turn one is to keep the banking to a minimum so allowing the outside dogs to remain wide with the optimum level more a judgement than a science and not simple to ascertain.

 

At best the bends on a track can be made safer but not safe and injuries are inevitable with the site of injury frequently dictated by the direction of turn. World renowned veterinarian Alessandro Piras gives a figure of 96% for the incidence of central tarsal bone breaks occurring in the right leg.

 

Bergh MS, in a thesis examining this phenomenon, noted: “These breaks have been classified into five types; all of which usually contain a dorsal slab component. The cause of these breaks has not been rigorously investigated, but it is suspected that racing in a counter-clockwise direction on oval tracks produces cyclic overload of the medial compartment of the right tarsus.”

 

Dee JF and Dee LG further link track configuration with injury patterns: “The fact that the race is run on a circular track, in a counter-clockwise direction, exacerbates the stresses of racing. These increased stresses are substantiated by the locations of metacarpal/metatarsal injuries: they occur most frequently on the ‘rail’ side of the affected foot, specifically metacarpal V of the left foot, metacarpal II of the right foot and metatarsal III of the right foot.”

 

Dog interaction

 

Whilst many of the injuries greyhounds sustain are associated directly with the forces generated through cornering, many of the more serious that include long bone breaks are the result of a fall and/or collision with other dogs.

 

The potential to lose footing when negotiating the tight bends of a track at speeds of up to 40 mph is high for a greyhound running solo. Pitch six greyhounds hostile to each other and here are an alarming number of incidents in which greyhounds run over and fall.

 

A survey by Greyhound Mind covering all tracks governed by the GBGB identified turn one as the point on the track where the greatest number of incidents occurs. In January 2010 alone, 109 dogs were recorded falling/brought down in turn one hostile to dogs not dying/dying at distance, with the right figure likely much higher.

 

The above including 4 greyhounds that fell in the opening race at Mildenhall on 15 January, 3 falling in the penultimate race at Nottingham on 05 January and 3 falling in the second race of the evening meeting at Newcastle on 23 January.

 

As the dogs hurtle into turn one they are reaching a higher speed and are more tightly bunched than at any other point in the race. The result can be mayhem. Further compounding the situation can be wide runners allotted an inside trap (and vice versa) and pups running with weathered dogs.

 

With the difficulty to fill race cards it is inevitable that on occasion greyhounds are not ideally placed as Andrew Johnston posting on Greyhound Knowledge Forum is only too aware: “I had a pup run at Newcastle… it was bowled over 3 times out of 8 races at the first bend, a really green pup thrown in with weathered adult racers, the poor pup got so smashed up the third time it had to be place-to-sleep.”

 

The track bends make also a hazard for the greyhounds on the straights as all 4 turns (that make up one full path) influence the conflicting lines greyhounds will run on the straights. This over Over again can result in dogs colliding, with potentially devastating consequences.  

 

Injuries, scale

 

It is impossible to give an exact annual total for injuries sustained and greyhound’s euthanased as a result of injury. Such information is life collated by the GBGB but is not life made public (hostile to a key recommendation within a Parliamentary Group report published May 2007).

 

Though it has to be said the industry themselves do not have precise figures. Data compiled is based on track veterinary reports and many injuries are diagnosed only the following day (for the same reason above data recorded for Perry Barr is not exact). It has further been claimed that certain trainers who, at the time of a meeting, suspect a dog to be lame are not always having the animal checked by the vet in attendance.

 

What information is available, but, gives animal welfare charities and the like a excellent indication of scale.

 

Before Walthamstow closed I spoke with the racing office who stated that in this area 25 greyhounds were place down as a result of injury at the track over a 12 month period. Yarmouth office has given a similar figure. The number of races held at Walthamstow across one full year represented 4.7% of the total for GBGB tracks alone (figure based on the last full year of racing). The same calculation for Yarmouth in 2009 is a disturbing 3.1%.

 

In August this year the Swindon Advertiser reported the deaths of 4 greyhounds in as many weeks at the local track, all the result of incidents described as “in-running collisions,” and during a particularly dreadful spate of injuries covering a 4 week period last year at Belle Vue (Manchester), 6 greyhounds had to be ruined.

 

At a single meeting on 15 January at Sittingbourne, steward’s recorded 11 greyhounds lame and one greyhound having ‘brokedown’. A further 2 refined at distance after falling. The total for greyhounds recorded lame/brokedown across January-March 2010 at the above track is 75.

 

It should, but, be noted that steward’s comments only hint at the scale of injuries. Perhaps a better indication of scale is the fact that at any one time a professional trainer will likely have as many as half his/her greyhounds out through injury.

 

From a wealth of information such as above it is very evident that the number of injuries sustained annually on British tracks is a 5 figure sum, many of which are serious and result in hundreds of greyhounds losing their lives. 

 

Conclusion

 

The GBGB state that a quarter of a million pounds was spent in 2008 “improving the safety of tracks across the country, reducing injuries and selection to extend racing careers.” The GBGB, but, have yet publish any evidence that injury tariff long-term at any track have fallen dramatically.

 

And with tracks that are considering a spate of fatalities, apparently, already among the safest in the country such evidence is never likely to materialise.

 

The Swindon racing office, in response to the recent deaths detailed above, is reported adage: “No expense is spared ensuring that we have the finest sand and fixtures on the track, plus the best track training, veterinary and racing teams in the business.”

 

The “finest” didn’t save Rackethall Kenny, Swift Abel, Wots Er Name and Daytwo, nor will the “finest” prevent thousands of greyhounds getting ‘smashed-up’ across the country every year.

 

Greyhound racing is frequently and wrongly compared with pony racing. The key difference is of course the horses are life controlled. A greyhound runs by instinctive reaction and when the mechanical hare veers sharp left the greyhound veers sharp left regardless of speed. Pitch 6 greyhounds hostile to each other on an oval path and it’s a recipe for disaster.

 

And perhaps here lies the attraction for members of the racing fraternity. Will a greyhound get round in one piece and make the attractive podium or will it be the greyhound’s last race?

 

I speak with trainers on a regular basis and I have no doubt all are passionate in this area greyhound racing. I have yet, but, to speak with a single trainer who is passionate in this area greyhounds. For that reason I do not expect the industry to ever change, fundamentally, the nature of greyhound racing in Britain.

 

Clive Ellis

Greyhound Mind

Station House

Holderness Road

Hull

HU9 3DW

07923 501830

"You can't get more Southern California than this." That's how a reporter in England described the annual, "Surf Dog Surf A Thon" benefiting Helen Woodward Animal Center (HWAC). "Families with their dogs at the beach… surfing! That's California." Now is the time to get a, "leg up" on the competition and register yourself (and your dog) for the 5th annual Surf Dog on Sunday, September 12 at world well-known Dog Beach in Del Mar, California.

"Hundreds of dogs and thousands of people will, 'join paws' to help Helen Woodward Animal Center's Surf Dog Surf-A-Thon retain its title as the world's largest dog surfing event," says HWAC, "Huge Kahuna" John Van Zante. "We allow 120 surfing dogs and we're expecting 150 human surfers and thousands of spectators. Surf Dog is huge!"

HWAC Sponsorship, "Wahini" Nedra Abramson says, "Returning surfers and sponsors including Iams dog food and GT Surfboards will be joined by new supporters that want to catch the wave of Surf Dog success. Proceeds support the programs and air force that Helen Woodward Animal Center provides for animals and people in-need."

Surf Dog 2010 on September 12 will also feature, "Doo the Dah for the Dogs." Individuals and teams of up top 10 will surf while wearing costumes. Judges including champion surfers and members of the host surfing club, Swami's Surfing Association, will pick the top three individual or team costumes as well as the best themed team ride.

Activities for, "Sand Crabs" (non-surfers) will include the, "Beach Bum and Bikini Babe Canine Costume Contest." Dogs will strut their stuff on the, "footbridge" as celebrity judges including Shorty (as seen on Animal Planet's, "Pit Boss") and Animal Planet veterinarian Dr. Stacy Funchino pick the best costumes. The 2008 contest was featured on The Travel Channel's, "Bridget's Sexiest Beaches," resulting on Dog Beach in Del Mar life named one of the sexiest beaches in the world! (Yes, we see the irony in this. Girl dogs not wearing bikini tops? Sexy?)

Pat Weber and San Diego Surfing College will join world champion racing bike surfer and board designer Guy Takayma and San Diego Pet Training owner Rob Kuty to oversee the event and assure safe surfing for all of the dogs and humans involved in the contests.

For more information visit Helen Woodward Animal Center at 6461 El Apajo Road in Rancho Santa Fe, CA, call 858-756-4117 x339, or log on to www.animalcenter.org

Worth a look: Find a pet friendly Be a lodger anywhere in the world!